{"RubricCriterionScale":[{"criterion":9264896,"description":"n/a","value":"0","scale_value":7703459,"id":38354600},{"criterion":9264896,"description":"n/a","value":"0","scale_value":7703458,"id":38354597},{"id":38354588,"value":"0","scale_value":7703455,"description":"For any of the following:\n• There is no defensible thesis.\n• The intended thesis only restates the prompt.\n• The intended thesis provides a summary of the issue with no apparent or coherent claim.\n• There is a thesis, but it does not respond to the prompt.\n\nResponses that do not earn this point:\n Only restate the prompt.\n• Make a generalized comment about the passage that doesn’t respond to the prompt.\n• Describe the passage or features of the passage rather than making a claim that requires a defense.","criterion":9264896},{"id":38354594,"scale_value":7703457,"value":"0","description":"n/a","criterion":9264896},{"id":38354591,"scale_value":7703456,"value":"1","description":"Responds to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible interpretation of the passage. \n\nResponses that earn this point:\nProvide a defensible interpretation in response to the prompt.","criterion":9264896},{"scale_value":7703457,"value":"2","id":38354595,"criterion":9264897,"description":"EVIDENCE:\nProvides some specific, relevant evidence.\n\nAND COMMENTARY:\nExplains how some of the evidence relates to the student’s argument, but no line of reasoning is established, or the line of reasoning is faulty.\n\nTypical responses that earn 2 points:\n• Consist of a mix of specific evidence and broad generalities.\n• May contain some simplistic, inaccurate, or repetitive explanations that don’t strengthen the argument.\n• May make one point well but either do not make multiple supporting claims or do not adequately support more than one claim.\n• Do not explain the connections or progression between the student’s claims, so a line of reasoning is not clearly established."},{"id":38354589,"scale_value":7703455,"value":"0","description":"Simply restates thesis (if present), repeats provided information, or offers information irrelevant to the prompt.\n\nTypical responses that earn 0 points:\n• Are incoherent or do not address the prompt.\n• May be just opinion with no textual references or references that are irrelevant.","criterion":9264897},{"criterion":9264897,"description":"EVIDENCE:\nProvides evidence that is mostly general.\n\nAND COMMENTARY:\nSummarizes the evidence but does not explain how the evidence supports the student’s argument.\n\nTypical responses that earn 1 point:\n• Tend to focus on overarching narrative developments or description of a passage rather than specific details or techniques.\n• Mention literary elements, devices, or techniques with little or no explanation.","scale_value":7703456,"value":"1","id":38354592},{"criterion":9264897,"description":"EVIDENCE:\nProvides specific evidence to support all claims in a line of reasoning.\n\nAND COMMENTARY:\nExplains how some of the evidence supports a line of reasoning.\nAND\nExplains how at least one literary element or technique in the passage contributes to its meaning.\n\nTypical responses that earn 3 points:\n• Uniformly offer evidence to support claims.\n• Focus on the importance of specific words and details from the passage to build an interpretation.\n• Organize an argument as a line of reasoning composed of multiple supporting claims.\n• Commentary may fail to integrate some evidence or fail to support a key claim.","value":"3","scale_value":7703458,"id":38354598},{"scale_value":7703459,"value":"4","id":38354601,"criterion":9264897,"description":"EVIDENCE:\nProvides specific evidence to support all claims in a line of reasoning.\n\nAND COMMENTARY:\nConsistently explains how the evidence supports a line of reasoning.\nAND\nExplains how multiple literary elements or techniques in the passage contribute to its meaning.\n\nTypical responses that earn 4 points:\n• Uniformly offer evidence to support claims.\n• Focus on the importance of specific words and details from the passage to build an interpretation.\n• Organize and support an argument as a line of reasoning composed of multiple supporting claims, each with adequate evidence that is clearly explained.\n• Explain how the writer’s use of multiple literary techniques contributes to the student’s interpretation of the passage."},{"scale_value":7703455,"value":"0","id":38354590,"criterion":9264898,"description":"Does not meet the criteria for 1 point.\n\nResponses that do not earn this point:\n• Attempt to contextualize of their interpretation, but such attempts consist predominantly of sweeping generalizations.\n• Only hint at or suggest other possible interpretations.\n• Make a single statement about how an interpretation of the passage comments on something thematic without consistently maintaining that thematic interpretation.\n• Oversimplify complexities in the passage.\n• Use complicated or complex sentences or language that is ineffective because it does not enhance the student's argument."},{"description":"n/a","criterion":9264898,"id":38354602,"value":"0","scale_value":7703459},{"id":38354599,"value":"0","scale_value":7703458,"description":"n/a","criterion":9264898},{"criterion":9264898,"description":"n/a","value":"0","scale_value":7703457,"id":38354596},{"id":38354593,"value":"1","scale_value":7703456,"description":"Demonstrates sophistication of thought and/or develops a complex literary argument. \n\nResponses that earn this point may demonstrate a sophistication of thought or develop a complex literary argument by doing any of the following:\n1. Identifying and exploring complexities or tensions within the passage.\n2. Illuminating the student’s interpretation by situating it within a broader context.\n3. Accounting for alternative interpretations of the passage.\n4. Employing a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive.","criterion":9264898}],"RubricScale":[{"value":"0","rubric":1088278,"position":1,"num":1,"name":"0 pts.","id":7703455},{"num":2,"position":2,"value":"0","rubric":1088278,"id":7703456,"name":"1 pt."},{"num":3,"position":3,"value":"0","rubric":1088278,"id":7703457,"name":"2 pts."},{"id":7703458,"name":"3 pts.","num":4,"rubric":1088278,"value":"0","position":4},{"id":7703459,"name":"4 pts.","num":5,"rubric":1088278,"value":"0","position":5}],"Rubric":[{"id":1088278,"distribute_criterion_percentage":0,"num":25,"description":null,"total_points":null,"papers_scored":0,"criterion_scales_all":[38354590,38354593,38354596,38354599,38354602,38354589,38354592,38354595,38354598,38354601,38354588,38354591,38354594,38354597,38354600],"owner":1058636068,"cv_loaded":"1","deleted":0,"scoring_method":4,"name":"AP Eng Prose Fiction Analysis","scale_values":[7703455,7703456,7703457,7703458,7703459],"rubric_group":null,"criterion":[9264896,9264897,9264898]}],"RubricCriterion":[{"id":9264896,"num":1,"position":1,"rubric":1088278,"description":"Thesis\n\n• The thesis may be more than one sentence, provided the sentences are in close proximity.\n• The thesis may be anywhere within the response.\n• For a thesis to be defensible, the passage must include at least minimal evidence that could be used to support that thesis; however, the student need not cite that evidence to earn the thesis point.\n• The thesis may establish a line of reasoning that structures the essay, but it needn’t do so to earn the thesis point.\n• A thesis that meets the criteria can be awarded the point whether or not the rest of the response successfully supports that line of reasoning.","previous_version":null,"name":"Thesis","criterion_scales":[38354588,38354591,38354594,38354597,38354600],"value":"0"},{"id":9264897,"num":2,"rubric":1088278,"position":2,"description":"Evidence and Commentary\n\n• Writing that suffers from grammatical and/or mechanical errors that interfere with communication cannot earn the fourth point in this row.\n• To earn the fourth point in this row, the response may observe multiple instances of the same literary element or technique if each instance further contributes to the meaning of the passage.","previous_version":null,"name":"Evid. & Comm.","criterion_scales":[38354589,38354592,38354595,38354598,38354601],"value":"0"},{"name":"Sophist.","criterion_scales":[38354590,38354593,38354596,38354599,38354602],"value":"0","id":9264898,"num":3,"rubric":1088278,"position":3,"description":"Sophistication\n\n• This point should be awarded only if the sophistication of thought or complex understanding is part of the student’s argument, not merely a phrase or reference.","previous_version":null}]}